Dr Luigi's concern

Tau2020

One year ago, we realized the dominant Harvard Tau method has to be removed after so many rejections it caused. The reasons of rejection are “priority is not high enough”, “the Harvard Tau method is better”, “this is between Dr JD Thomas and you”…So,

The 7th letter to Dr JD Thomas

Dear Dr Thomas,

This is the 7^th letter to you. Because all the previous ones were ignored, it might be a good idea to go public.

Please formally address your Tau formula which is logically flawed in our opinion.

Verification of flawed theory needs manipulated data, which is a hot topic in the whole medical publishing industry right now.

Inspired by the recent American election, let’s give each other a chance by exchanging ideas.

We might be wrong, please show us the right way.

Xufang

To:jthomas8@nmh.org

Cc:pieter.vandervoort@zol.be,circ@circulationjournal.org,AHJ@dm.duke.edu

Selective Amnesia is Not a Choice for the Harvard Method of Tau

Why We Measure Tau?

The Harvard Method of Tau Papers Should be Retracted

The Harvard method was invented in 1992 by Dr James Thomas from Harvard and got a brief experimental verification.

Not Only Tau

Tau renders us a new approach to the cardiac function assessment. Since Tau is directly related to how powerful the muscle is at the beginning of diastole, it is well accepted as the best index to describe diastolic function.